Links to Research

PDFs of my research pre-prints or open access articles are available on Google Drive via this link.

Research Statement

The central theme of my research is personalization: its possibility, value, and risks in ethics, politics, and technology. My dissertation, “Ethics for the Depressed: A Value Ethics of Engagement,” investigates the possibility of personalizing ethical theory in contexts of limited autonomy. I argue that depressed persons suffer from “existential guilt,” which amounts to a two-part compulsion: 1) the compulsive assertion or sense of a vague and all-encompassing or absolute threat that disrupts action and intention formation, and 2) the compulsive taking of such disruption to be a reason for inaction. I develop in response an “ethics for the depressed,” an ethical theory directed to those suffering from existential guilt. I challenge the standard account of depressive loss of motivation as being a loss of desires and argue instead that it involves the defeating presence of what the phenomenologist Matthew Ratcliffe calls “pre-intentional” mental states, a category that I redefine to include “quasi-beliefs” and habits of feeling, that interfere with intention formation and action despite the persistence of desire. Demonstrating that depressed persons may retain their desires and values in depression, I then premise a value ethics tailored to the depressed upon what I call the consistent desire for a “sense of stability” in response to experiences of precarity and isolation. I then extend the concept of the pre-intentional to the phenomenology of value, developing the concept of “felt values” or intuitive value paradigms that are pre-intentional states as a starting point for collective ethical deliberation. I thus put an orthodox style of philosophy in service of an unorthodox agent: one who is “aspiringly autonomous.”

My recent publications further develop the central concepts I introduce in my dissertation. In “The Pre-Intentional, Existential Feelings, and Existential Dispositions” (Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 2023), I argue pre-intentional states should be understood as “existential dispositions” and that existential feelings are a way in which an agent becomes aware of their existential dispositions. I define existential dispositions as a category of states that are introspectively opaque and so ambiguous between being an intentional state, like a “quasi-belief,” or non-intentional state, like a reflex. This allows for a novel account of “indirect bi-directionality,” or of how change in, say, beliefs about what one’s experiences of depression signify may induce existential change that alleviates the suffering of these experiences. In “Vigilant Inquiry and Qualitative Disunity” (Contemporary Pragmatism, 2023), I propose a revision of John Dewey’s anti-elitist political philosophy and epistemology that recognizes the possibility of “qualitative disunity” and of “vigilant inquiry” as a response to it. The concept of “qualitative disunity” sheds light on disagreements on the topic of normativity between classical and neo-pragmatism, particularly the political themes of power and tragedy. In my current work in progress, I argue that AI opacity produces a “hard problem" of autonomy: if AI assistance is uninterpretable, human reasoning reliant upon it effectively becomes post-hoc rationalization. This problem is sharpest in the field of “edtech” or education, because one of the goals of a democratic education is to develop autonomy, and here the risk of AI opacity is twofold, individual and collective. Individually, the student may fail to develop the deliberative process or dispositions for reasoning about ends. Collectively, students may be “siloed” by inscrutable standards of guidance and assessment. The potential result, I argue, is isolation in the name of personalization.